A question that has confounded the church for centuries is whether or not the Bible presents evidence for a plurality of elders or for single elder rule. Although there are no explicit commands in scripture regarding this matter, there are biblical implications, historical evidence, and practical advantages to support a plurality of elders in each local church.
The Scripture presents a consistent pattern of plurality. The church in Jerusalem is spoken of eight times in the book of Acts as having elders (Acts 20:17); the churches to which James wrote had elders (James 5:14), as did the churches to which Peter wrote (I Peter 5:1), and perhaps the strongest evidence is found in Acts 14:23 where Paul and Barnabas appoint elders in each church.[1] These passages represent instances where the plural form of elder, overseer, or pastor is used in connection with a local church. There are many other passages that imply plurality.
Historically, conservative churches have interpreted the Scriptures as teaching the plurality of elders although there have been differing opinions on how these elders function in practice. The Presbyterian form differs from other congregational forms in that it allows for a hierarchy of church government. Elders, in this system, are chosen by the congregation and form a session. Members of the sessions form the presbytery and members of the presbytery form a general assembly.[2] Although this system does have some benefits and has been successfully practiced, I believe that there is sufficient evidence to support a congregational form of church government with a plurality of elders without the hierarchy of leadership. In a plural local elder government model, the congregation chooses elders who share authority over their local church under the watchful eye of the congregation. Elders are chosen who have differing yet complimentary gifts to join together in the responsibility of shepherding the flock. All must meet biblical qualifications and share authority but each has specific areas of giftedness. I believe this model is the most faithful to Scripture and subsequently bring the most benefits to the elders and the congregation.
There are numerous practical advantages to the biblical practice of a plurality of elders. “Because it works” would be shaky ground to build an argument so that’s why I put this point last after biblical evidence and historical precedent. A book could be written on the practical benefits but just to name a few:
First, the authority to rule and judge does not fall on one person; Second, the elders have complimentary gifts, which work harmoniously to shepherd the flock; Thirdly, the elder’s personal strengths and weakness are rounded out; Fourthly, the elders are built up spiritually, emotionally, and mentally through common study, prayer, encouragement, and fellowship.
Many evangelical churches have for one reason or another strayed away from plural local elder government but there does seem to be a resurgence of this practice in our day. Although there is no direct command in Scripture, the evidence is in favor in the diversity of implied texts. The additional support of church history and the practical benefits make the plurality of elders in each local church the preferred model of congregational church government.